Words change perspectives

Language evolves, and few words illustrate that better than "woke." Originally, woke simply meant being awake to injustice, particularly racial injustice. One of the earliest recorded uses appeared in 1938, when the blues musician Huddie Ledbetter, aka Lead Belly, advised young Black Americans to "stay woke" in his song about the Scottsboro Boys. His message was straightforward: remain alert to discrimination, injustice, and the realities of the world around you.

Over time, the meaning of the word expanded to include awareness of broader social inequalities. More recently, however, woke has become a highly contested political label. For some, it still represents awareness and social responsibility. For others, it has become a catch-all term used to criticise ideas or initiatives relating to race, gender, diversity, or inclusion, and often without a clear or consistent definition. I think this shift tells us something important as words are powerful because they shape how we understand the world. When the meaning of a word changes, so does the conversation surrounding it.

You can reframe everything

Many organisations have been conditioned to look for sameness: the "ideal" employee, the "right" way to think, or the "best fit." History repeatedly reminds us that progress rarely comes from people who think exactly like everyone else. Some historians and psychologists have suggested that figures such as Isaac Newton displayed characteristics that today might be associated with neurodivergence. Others point to Adam Smith, whose lifestyle and habits did not always conform to the social expectations of his time. Whether these interpretations are accurate is almost beside the point. The common thread is this: many of the people who have disproportionately shaped our world were anything but conventional.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb makes a related observation throughout his work, particularly in his book, The Black Swan. Systems that optimise for the average often become less resilient and less innovative than those that embrace variation, adaptability, and different ways of thinking. I think one of the most powerful leadership skills is the ability to reframe what we see.

““Human diversity is not a flaw in the system. It is one of the reasons the system evolves.””
— Burrellism

Why adult friendships are hard

One of the questions I am asked from time to time is why friendships seem to change as we get older. In my experience, it’s not personal. Research suggests that adult friendships are shaped by three important factors: proximity, timing, and energy.

Proximity
Friendships are built through repeated interaction. When we were younger, school, university, or sport naturally placed us alongside the same people every day. Research by Jeffrey Hall suggests that close friendships develop over many hours of shared time and experience. As adults, those opportunities become far less frequent, making it harder to build and maintain close relationships.

Timing
As we move through life, our priorities naturally diverge. One friend may be raising young children, another may be building a business, while someone else is caring for ageing parents or travelling the world. You may still value one another deeply, but your lives no longer move at the same pace. Even colleagues who get on exceptionally well may rarely meet outside work because they are in very different stages of life.

Energy
Friendships also evolve as we evolve. Perhaps you stop drinking alcohol, take up long-distance running, become more politically engaged, or simply begin valuing quieter weekends over late nights. None of these changes are inherently good or bad, but they can alter the activities, conversations, and experiences that once held a friendship together.

I think understanding these three factors has helped me see friendships differently. Sometimes a friendship fades because life changes and not because either person has done something wrong. Perhaps the goal is not to hold on to every friendship forever, but to appreciate the role each person has played in our journey while remaining open to new connections as we continue to grow.

It’s already within you

We are living in a world that gives us more information, more opinions, and more comparisons than ever before. Attention is constantly fragmented, and it can feel as though we are not only living our lives but also evaluating how those lives appear to everyone else in real time. I think this changes us as it encourages us to become highly self-conscious without necessarily becoming more self-aware. We spend so much time managing how we are perceived that we lose touch with how we actually feel. We begin performing our lives rather than fully inhabiting them.

Yet our greatest resource is rarely found outside ourselves. It is found in our accumulated experience, our instincts, our values, and our capacity to think clearly when we are fully present. We often know far more than we give ourselves credit for and what gets in the way is the internal commentary. The voice that questions our ability, magnifies our fears, and convinces us that we are not ready. This is where coaching can make a profound difference as a coach does not give you your potential. A coach helps you access it through thoughtful questions, reflection, and honest dialogue, coaching quietens the internal noise so that your own judgment, wisdom, and natural intelligence have room to emerge.

““A fourth monkey has emerged. He sees no one, hears no one and speaks to no one.””
— Chris Laping

4-Mat

One of the most effective presentation frameworks I have come across is built around four simple questions: Why. What. How. Now.
It mirrors the way many people naturally process information and helps keep an audience engaged from beginning to end.

Why
Start by explaining why the topic matters. Why is this conversation important, and why is it relevant right now? Without a compelling reason to care, even the best content is unlikely to hold people's attention.

What
Once people understand the purpose, explain the key concepts. What are the factors influencing the situation? What does the audience need to understand before they can take action?

How
Next, make it practical. Show how these ideas apply in the real world. Help people understand how the concepts affect them, their teams, or their organisation.

Now
Finally, answer the most important question: What should I do next? People do not need to remember every detail of your presentation. They need one or two practical actions they can implement immediately.

I have found that when you guide an audience through these four stages, they remain far more engaged because you are addressing the questions they are already asking themselves. You move from creating awareness to building understanding, from understanding to application, and ultimately from insight to action. I think great presentations are rarely remembered because they contain the most information. They are remembered because they make it easy for people to understand why something matters and what they should do next. What do you think?

Same voice, different stage

Timothy Gallwey's "The Inner Game" distinguishes between Self 1 and Self 2 is highly respected in coaching, sport psychology, and leadership.

Self 1 is the internal commentator. It judges, compares, analyses, and replays conversations long after they have ended. It questions whether you are good enough and often fills the mind with self-doubt. Self 1 is not the enemy, it is trying to protect you but it can become a poor leader when its voice dominates your thinking.

Self 2 is different. It represents your experience, your instincts, and the capabilities you have developed through learning and practice. It is the part of you that performs naturally when you stop overthinking. Athletes describe it as being "in the zone." Psychologists often refer to it as flow.

One of the goals of coaching is to quiet that internal commentary. Not to eliminate it, but to prevent it from drowning out the capability that already exists. When Self 1 becomes quieter, Self 2 has the space to perform. Perhaps confidence is not about becoming someone different. Perhaps it is about learning to trust the person you have already become. What do you think?

The power of a pause

Breathing is not only one of the most powerful tools we have, it’s also something we do every day without thinking about it. Breathing is unique because it operates both automatically and under conscious control. Yet, at any moment, we can choose to slow it down, deepen it, and use it to influence how we respond to the world around us. When we feel stressed or threatened, our brain prepares us to react, our heart rate increases, our breathing becomes shallower, and our attention narrows. This response has served humanity well throughout evolution, but it is not always helpful in a modern workplace.

I think a deliberate pause followed by a slow, conscious breath, creates space between stimulus and response. It helps regulate our emotional state and allows the prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain responsible for reasoning, judgment, and self-control) to play a greater role in our decision-making. In leadership, that pause can make all the difference because instead of reacting impulsively, we gain the opportunity to respond intentionally. We can question our assumptions, choose our words more carefully, and act in a way that reflects our values rather than our immediate emotions. If you want to take this a step further, develop a regular mindfulness or meditation practice. Like any leadership capability, self-awareness strengthens with consistent practice, and sometimes the most important decision you make begins with a single breath.

Brighter days

Discipline, preparation, and hard work are not punishments, I think they are investments in the future you want to create. The habits required for success often produce rewards long before the final goal is achieved. They build confidence, strengthen character, and expand your opportunities. Success is not only measured by the outcome, but also by the person you become in the process as the work itself is part of the reward.

We are all mammals

Inclusive leadership begins with recognising that our brains naturally rely on shortcuts and assumptions. The responsibility of leadership is to move beyond those automatic reactions and create environments where people are evaluated on their contribution rather than on what feels familiar. I think the goal of diversity and inclusion is not to change human nature, it is to create experiences that gradually transform the unfamiliar into the familiar. And when that happens, curiosity begins to replace fear, and understanding replaces assumption. What role do you think leaders play in helping people move from instinctive reactions to intentional inclusion?

,

Why diversity feels uncomfortable

,

One of the things that fascinates me is the relationship between neuroscience and leadership. Our brains are remarkable, but they were shaped for a world very different from the one we live in today. For much of human history, we lived in relatively small social groups where quickly distinguishing between what was familiar and what was unfamiliar had survival value. When we encounter something unexpected, our brains often generate an automatic emotional response before our rational thinking has had time to engage. Evolutionarily older brain structures, including the amygdala, help us detect novelty and potential threat, while the prefrontal cortex allows us to slow down, reflect, and make more considered decisions.

I think this has important implications for the diversity conversation. Feeling a moment of uncertainty when we encounter someone or something unfamiliar does not make us bad people. It makes us human. The question is not whether we experience these automatic responses, the question is what we do next. Do we allow our first reaction to determine our behaviour, or do we become curious enough to question it?

Performance = Potential – Interference

One of my favourite coaching models comes from Sir John Whitmore's work on performance: Performance = Potential – Interference
In other words, our performance reflects what we are capable of once the interference has been reduced. Sometimes that interference is external, for example, a lack of resources, organisational politics, or unclear priorities. Often, however, it comes from within: limiting beliefs, fear of failure, perfectionism, or the need for external validation. The encouraging part is that internal interference can be recognised, challenged, and reduced.

I think this is where coaching can make a profound difference, as a coach does not give you all the answers. A coach helps you think more clearly, challenge assumptions, and uncover the obstacles that are preventing you from performing at your best. The goal is not to become someone else. It is to remove what is standing between you and the best version of yourself, because when interference decreases, potential has room to emerge. Contact me via this link for a complimentary 30 minute discovery session.

Awareness is curative

In many ways, we are all performers. The stage simply changes, for some, it is the boardroom and for others, it is a client meeting, a team presentation, or a difficult conversation. Today, those stages are louder and more visible than ever as we are no longer just focused on doing our work well; we are increasingly aware of how our performance is being perceived by others. That constant awareness can become distracting. We begin to imagine what everyone else is thinking, second-guess our decisions, and allow self-doubt to occupy space that could otherwise be used for creativity, learning, and growth. I think that self-doubt is one of the greatest obstacles to excellence. The question is not whether you have potential as most people have far more potential than they realise. The more important question is: What is preventing you from accessing it?

““All the world is a stage, and all the men and women are merely players.””
— William Shakespeare

Rethinking inclusion

Inclusion extends far beyond recruitment as it requires leaders to examine which behaviours are rewarded, whose voices carry influence, who receives informal sponsorship, and whether success depends on fitting an existing mould rather than contributing new perspectives. Culture is shaped by the behaviours we recognise, reward, and promote. And if we continue to reward only one form of cultural capital, we should not be surprised when many talented people conclude that belonging comes at the cost of authenticity. I think true inclusion begins when organisations stop asking people to fit the culture and start asking how the culture itself can evolve.

Measuring inclusion

An organisation may recruit people from different backgrounds and celebrate diversity externally, while continuing to reward only one way of thinking, communicating, leading, or succeeding internally. People are invited into the building, but they are still expected to adapt to norms that were never designed with them in mind. The result is a subtle and an important contradiction. We tell people they belong, yet we continue to evaluate success through a narrow set of expectations that reflect the existing culture rather than embracing the diversity we claim to value. I think this is not simply a question of fairness, it’s also a leadership challenge. If organisations genuinely want the benefits associated with diversity, for example, better decision-making, greater innovation, and stronger problem-solving, then they must create environments where different perspectives can be expressed without requiring people to leave part of themselves at the door.

Understanding cultural capital

One perspective that I find particularly useful comes from the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu and his concept of cultural capital. Bourdieu argued that society is not a level playing field. Instead, we operate within different social and professional "fields", each with its own unwritten rules. Success is influenced not only by competence but also by possessing the forms of knowledge, behaviour, communication style, educational background, and social networks that a particular environment values. In other words, cultural capital functions as a type of currency.

I think that in many organisations, success depends on understanding rules that are rarely written down. Knowing how to communicate with senior leaders, when to challenge an idea, how visible to make your achievements, or which behaviours are rewarded can become just as important as technical expertise. The challenge is that these expectations often feel natural to those who already possess the dominant form of cultural capital. For everyone else, they remain invisible and this is where performative inclusion often reveals itself.

Beyond performative inclusion

When organisations speak about inclusion, the conversation often focuses on representation, for example: How many women are in leadership? How many people from underrepresented backgrounds have been recruited? How diverse does the organisation appear? These are important questions, but they rarely tell the whole story. I think an equally important question is this: Who succeeds once they are inside the organisation, and why?

There are many ways to interpret why organisations continue to struggle with genuine inclusion. Some point to financial incentives, and others highlight the value of accessing diverse perspectives while leaving existing power structures untouched. Some describe this as performative inclusion or inclusivity-washing, where the language of inclusion advances more quickly than the culture itself. What do you think?

,

There is a difference

,

The difference between managing performance and developing people is significant. Great leaders look beyond output as they recognise potential, create opportunities, and use their influence to advocate for others when they are not in the room. This is one of the reasons I am so passionate about coaching. I see coaching as a process of helping people reconnect with themselves, gain clarity about what they stand for, and lead with greater confidence, purpose, and intention.

Some of the most meaningful transformations happen when people rediscover strengths, values, and qualities that have been overshadowed by pressure, expectation, or self-doubt. They begin to lead from a place that feels authentic and aligned with who they are. Now if that is a journey you are ready to begin, I would be honoured to walk alongside you.
Contact me via this link for a complimentary 30 minute discovery meeting.

Quiet power

Quiet power is leadership rooted in self-knowledge rather than self-doubt. It is the confidence to remain true to your values, even when the systems around you encourage conformity over authenticity. Throughout my career, I have worked with talented professionals who gradually began to dim their light in order to fit into organisational cultures that no longer reflected who they were. They learned to prioritise compliance over contribution, output over purpose, and acceptance over authenticity.

As leaders, we should pause and ask ourselves some important questions, for example: Do you have confidence in the systems you work within? How do you respond when your performance review does not reflect the value you believe you have created? Do you feel recognised as a person with unique strengths and potential, or simply as another resource responsible for delivering results? And perhaps the most important question is this: Who is advocating for you when you are not in the room?

Being human is an advantage

Organisations are racing toward an AI-driven productivity era at an unprecedented scale and speed. The pressure on people at every level is to execute faster, leaner, and more efficiently than ever before. In many organisations, the expectation is to produce more with fewer resources while continuously adapting to new technologies and ways of working. In that environment, technical competence alone will no longer be enough. The people who will thrive are those who possess qualities that technology cannot easily replicate: sound judgment, curiosity, emotional intelligence, integrity, and the ability to build meaningful relationships.

I think that a person who knows who they are, what they stand for, and what they are building is not simply surviving this transformation, they are becoming indispensable. They are able to navigate uncertainty with clarity, make thoughtful decisions under pressure, and remain grounded when everything around them is changing. And as AI becomes more capable, our uniquely human capabilities become even more valuable. The future of work will not belong solely to those who know how to use technology. It will belong to those who know how to combine technology with wisdom, empathy, creativity, and purpose. In a world where machines can increasingly perform tasks, our greatest competitive advantage may be our ability to connect, to lead, and to bring out the best in other people. What do you think?

I find it helpful

We are all sharing the same planet, so if we are not here to make things better for the people we lead, the organisations we serve, and the communities we belong to, then what exactly are we here for?

““All my life I have found reassurance in the countryside; have found sorrows and anxieties benefitting from a walk through a meadow. Pleasant sights, sounds, smells, to take my mind off its particular worry, as refreshing and restoring as a cool drink on a hot day.” ”
— C.R. Milne