research

So Danish!

When we encounter unfamiliar social situations or people who appear different from what we perceive as familiar, the brain can respond with heightened alertness. Research in neuroscience suggests that the amygdala, a region associated with threat detection and emotional processing, becomes more active when we are exposed to uncertainty or unfamiliarity. From an evolutionary perspective, this response once served an important survival function. Human beings evolved to quickly assess potential threats in their environment, helping our species respond to danger and uncertainty.

In modern society, however, these instinctive responses can still appear even when no real threat exists. We may notice subtle physical reactions such as increased tension, a faster heart rate, or a feeling of discomfort when confronted with the unexpected. I think this is important because many of our unconscious biases operate below the level of conscious awareness. Without reflection, we can mistake familiarity for safety and difference for risk. The challenge for leaders is not to pretend these instincts do not exist, but to become aware of them so they do not unconsciously shape decision-making, relationships, and organisational culture. Awareness creates the possibility for more thoughtful, objective, and inclusive leadership.

“Letting go of fear requires openness, curiosity, vulnerability, courage and resilience.”
— Dr. Poornima Luthra

Strategic outcomes

Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have questioned the effectiveness of S.M.A.R.T goals (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, time-bound). They suggest that better outcomes might be achieved by adopting F.A.S.T goals (frequently discussed, ambitious, specific, and transparent) instead. The MIT researchers think goals should be embedded in ongoing discussions to review progress, allocate resources, prioritise initiatives, and provide feedback. Objectives should be challenging yet attainable and translated into concrete metrics and milestones to clarify how to achieve each goal and measure progress. Additionally, goals and current performance should be made public for all employees to see. What do you think?


Generosity is a boomerang

Life gets so much better when you expect less as I think time generosity is grounded in empathy and emotional labour. In my world, generosity does not mean free; generosity does not mean lowering the price of what you do or giving it away. Generosity means showing up with emotional labour to do difficult work that some people think you might not need to do. This means that when someone is truly generous, they are bringing extra effort into something that may not work.

 

According to research from scientists at CalTech and Harvard who tried to figure out why giving feels harder for some than for others, and they found that the decision to give or take simply comes down to how much importance you attach to your interests versus someone else’s. Therefore, if you’re the type of person who considers other people’s needs as much as your own, self-sacrificing tends to be automatic. On the other hand, if you typically place more value on yourself, then giving feels more onerous.


Where do you need to make changes?

As a strategic leader it’s important to develop the direction the organisation is going via workshops. In my experience big ideas result from collaboration, study, and research analysis. Once you have the big idea you must develop a clear communication strategy of how you will communicate them efficiently throughout the organisation. Afterwards, oversee the implementation of these big ideas and finally, determine how the big ideas need to be refined and changed on a continuous basis. I think communicating these big ideas takes place daily through everything that you do. Contact me via e-mail for a meeting to discuss your workshop options.